📰On The Record – 11th August 2026

Jamie Dimon spent yesterday defending the American Dream to a generation that's stopped believing in it. The JPMorgan chief said the dream still works for most people, but admitted the bottom fifth of households have been left behind for decades, their wages stagnant and their options shrinking. It matters because Dimon isn't some outsider lobbing grenades — he runs the largest bank in the country and still can't pretend the gap isn't real. When Wall Street's most powerful banker starts talking about inequality fuelling political anger, capitalism's biggest defenders are quietly admitting the cracks are showing.

Berkshire Hathaway posted a 16% jump in operating earnings on Monday, and for the first time since Greg Abel took over as CEO, the numbers showed him actually putting Warren Buffett's legendary cash hoard to work. Berkshire poured roughly $10 billion into Alphabet, snapped up homebuilder Taylor Morrison, and resumed buying back its own stock, even as its cash pile still sits near $365 billion. It matters because Wall Street has spent months wondering whether Abel would keep Buffett's famously cautious style or start swinging. Turns out he's doing both — just with a bit more nerve.

There's a popular idea going around boardrooms that transparency means telling employees everything — every number, every worry, every half-formed plan. It sounds noble. In practice, it just moves the anxiety from leadership's desk to everyone else's inbox. Real transparency isn't about volume, it's about intention: giving people the context behind a decision, being honest about what can't be shared yet, and actually listening when they push back. Leaders who confuse oversharing with honesty end up with teams that know everything and understand nothing. The best communicators aren't the ones saying the most — they're the ones being believed the most.

Transparency isn't a firehose. It's a conversation.

Meta released Muse Glimmer on Monday, a compact AI model built to run on an ordinary laptop instead of a distant server farm, and gave away the underlying code for free. Mark Zuckerberg framed it as a direct shot at OpenAI and Anthropic, arguing advanced AI shouldn't be locked inside a handful of companies or governments. It matters because Meta is betting that giving its technology away builds more loyalty — and more market share — than charging for it ever could. If open models keep closing the gap on the paid ones, the entire business model behind AI subscriptions starts looking shaky.

Meta's decision to open source its most powerful AI model reignited an old argument: should the most powerful technology of the decade sit behind a paywall, or be handed to anyone who wants to build on it?

The case for openness says it speeds up innovation and stops power concentrating in a few boardrooms.

The case against says giving away frontier AI kills any real economic moat and invites misuse with no gatekeeper watching.

Both arguments have genuine staying power. What the debate really shows is that nobody, not even the companies building this technology, has decided what kind of industry AI should become.

Everyone’s hunting for the next Unicorn.

The type of “category disruptor” that grows fast and turns early believers into big winners.

59,000+ investors think that Mode Mobile could be one of those rare finds.

Americans spend 4 ½ hours on their phones daily, and Mode Mobile is monetizing that screentime. With $1B+ earned by over 490M customers and 32,481% revenue growth, Mode’s EarnPhone is turning smartphones into income generating assets.

Their previous raises sold out, and the company is now offering pre-IPO shares at $0.52/share with up to 20% bonus, exclusive to early investors.

Being early is everything, and this window is still open.

>> Review the offer before it closes

^{*Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com.}

^{Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.}

^{The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.}

Microsoft is pushing hard on its in-house Maia AI chips, planning to significantly ramp production of the next-gen Maia 300 in 2027 despite lukewarm uptake of the current version. The goal is simple: stop depending so heavily on expensive Nvidia hardware. It matters because even the biggest cloud giants are racing to control their own AI supply chains, and that race is reshaping who gets rich from the AI boom.

The U.S. is keeping its naval blockade on Iran in place as talks to reopen the Strait of Hormuz stall, redirecting dozens of commercial vessels away from Iranian ports. Iran wants sanctions relief and compensation before it budges. It matters because Hormuz carries a massive share of the world's oil and gas, and every week this standoff drags on keeps energy markets on edge.

Nvidia is teaming up with Wall Street heavyweights including Goldman Sachs, Blackstone and KKR on a potential $500 billion financing push to build out AI infrastructure — data centres, chips, and the power to run them. It matters because private capital is now doing as much heavy lifting as Big Tech's own balance sheets, and Nvidia's fingerprints are on almost all of it.

Chinese tech giants ByteDance, Tencent and Alibaba pulled the plug on their AI companion features this month, complying with new rules banning apps from manipulating users' emotions or replacing real relationships. For some, the loss wasn't trivial — one woman had exchanged roughly 700,000 messages with her AI boyfriend over two years and never got a goodbye. It matters because AI companionship has quietly become a massive, sticky product category, and China just ran the world's first real test of switching it off overnight. Some suspect the timing is tied to Beijing's push to lift the birth rate. Either way, regulators everywhere else are almost certainly taking notes.

Every AI request leaves a trail. Mesh gives engineering and finance complete visibility into who used which model, how many tokens were consumed and where your AI budget is going.

Stop guessing. Start governing AI spend.

Connect once, switch between GPT, Claude, Gemini and hundreds more whenever you want, while automatically routing requests for 40% lower costs and 99.99% AI response rate.

Get FREE Audit

Chief of staff roles used to be the job nobody outside the C-suite could quite explain. Now they're becoming one of the more coveted routes into it. Salaries can stretch past $400,000 in tech and finance, and the role hands you a front-row seat to how real decisions get made — strategy, operations, the messy stuff that never makes the org chart. Roughly two-thirds of chiefs of staff get promoted after leaving the role, often jumping more than one level. It's essentially an apprenticeship for running a company, minus the years of paying dues the traditional way. Whether that's a smart shortcut or a skipped step probably depends on who you ask in five years.

The corner office just got a side door.

From a devastating earthquake to billionaires buying football clubs and whisky brands, here's the rest of Monday's news in brief.

A year ago today, Nvidia and AMD struck an extraordinary deal with the Trump administration: hand over 15% of revenue from AI chip sales to China in exchange for export licences. Critics called it unconstitutional; the White House called it smart business. A year on, with Nvidia now organising a $500 billion AI financing push, the deal looks less like a one-off and more like the moment Washington decided AI hardware was too valuable to simply regulate — it wanted a cut too.

Sometime in the past few weeks, the world quietly crossed 3 terawatts of installed solar power — enough to cover peak US electricity demand three times over — and almost nobody noticed. It took a decade to hit the first terawatt; the next two arrived in under three years. It got buried under AI headlines and trade drama, but it matters more than most of Monday's news: the number of countries with at least a gigawatt of solar has jumped from 42 to 74 in just five years. Executives planning around energy costs should be paying more attention than the silence suggests.