Good morning and welcome to the weekend! There was a particular flavour of business on Friday where everyone's quietly recalibrating trust. Not shouting about it β just quietly checking who's allowed near the code, who's actually delivering on their promises, and who might be eyeing the exit before things get messier. Big institutions spent yesterday drawing lines: around data, around leadership, around the truth in their own AI roadmaps. Dealmakers kept dealmaking, founders kept founding, and at least one household name in activewear decided the grass wasn't greener under someone else's ownership after all. It was a day for reading between the lines β because increasingly, that's where the real story sits. Coffee's ready. Let's get into it.
CODE RED AT ALIBABA
Alibaba Locks Out Anthropic's Coding Tool Over Spying Fears

Alibaba told staff to stop using Anthropic's Claude Code from 10 July, citing fears the tool can flag China-linked users and quietly collect data like timezones and proxy settings. Employees are being pushed towards Qoder, Alibaba's homegrown alternative. The ban lands days after Anthropic accused Alibaba of ripping off Claude's capabilities to train its own models β so this isn't really about one coding tool. It's about two AI giants who no longer trust each other's software, and a signal that the AI race is splitting into rival, mutually suspicious camps.
CENTRAL BANKER EYES THE ΓLYSΓE
Lagarde Refuses to Rule Out Early ECB Exit

Christine Lagarde admitted she wouldn't rule out leaving the European Central Bank before her term ends in October 2027, if it meant she could play a role in France's next presidential race. She insists she has no plans to run β but "no plans" has never stopped speculation before. The comment matters because central bank independence relies on leaders looking uninterested in politics, not adjacent to it. If Europe's top rate-setter is even entertaining an early exit, markets will start pricing in who comes next, and whether Frankfurt's next resident will be quite so steady.
TODAYβS MUST READS
π€ Zuckerberg Admits Meta's AI Agents Are Behind Schedule
Mark Zuckerberg told staff at an internal town hall that Meta's AI agents are progressing more slowly than expected, despite billions poured into infrastructure and a major team reshuffle. He's still committed to the long-term "superintelligence" goal, but admitted meaningful results are three to six months out, not now. For a company that's bet its next act on AI catching up to its own hype, an admission like that from the top is notable. It's a reminder that even the deepest pockets in tech can't just buy their way past the hard parts of building genuinely useful AI.
π¦ Starling Cuts 130 Jobs to Make Room for AI
UK digital bank Starling is cutting 130 roles, about 3% of its workforce, as part of a push to simplify operations and lean harder on artificial intelligence. The bank will keep hiring AI and tech engineers even as it trims elsewhere, following a dip in annual revenue and profit. It's the same pattern showing up across fintech: growth alone no longer buys goodwill, and efficiency is the new pitch to investors. For staff, it's a blunt reminder that "AI-powered simplification" is corporate-speak that often starts with headcount.
π Goldman Grabs Nearly Half of Europe's Mega Deals
Goldman Sachs advised on 44% of all M&A deal value across Europe, the Middle East and Africa in the first half of 2026, as regional dealmaking hit a 19-year high of $676 billion. It worked on 15 of the region's 20 biggest deals, pulling further ahead of JPMorgan and other rivals. The boom reflects companies chasing long-term strategic bets despite a choppy market backdrop. For smaller advisory firms, the message is blunt: when the biggest deals are on the table, one bank is increasingly the only name in the room.
ποΈ Gymshark's Founder Wants His Old Stake Back
Ben Francis is reportedly in talks to buy back part of the 21% stake in Gymshark he sold to private equity firm General Atlantic back in 2020. The brand's revenue is still climbing, but profits are under pressure as competition in activewear intensifies. Francis clawing back control fits a wider mood among founders who sold early and now want more say over where their company goes next. It's a reminder that private equity deals aren't always a one-way street β sometimes the person who built the thing wants the wheel back.
What's changing in global hiring?
Global hiring is changing fast. From AI's impact on HR to evolving compliance requirements and international expansion strategies, the rules are constantly shifting.
Oyster's events bring together HR leaders, founders, operators, and global employment experts to discuss what's working nowβand what's coming next.
Whether you're hiring internationally today or planning for tomorrow, you'll walk away with practical insights you can actually use.
THIS TIME, LAST YEAR
Trump and Vietnam Struck a Tariff Deal Last July

A year ago, Donald Trump announced the US had struck a trade framework with Vietnam: a 20% tariff on most Vietnamese exports and a steep 40% levy on goods transshipped through Vietnam from other countries, arriving days before a tariff deadline was due to bite. Nike and other Vietnam-reliant retailers rallied on the news. A year on, with the framework still being finalised and transshipment rules still contested, it's a reminder that "done deals" in trade policy rarely stay done.
LOST IN TRANSLATION
βModel extractionβ
What it means: It's when one AI company trains its own model by feeding it outputs from a rival's model β essentially learning the answers without doing the underlying research. It's cheaper and faster than building from scratch, but it's also the accusation at the heart of Anthropic and Alibaba's current stand-off, and one reason Alibaba's staff are being steered away from Claude Code altogether.
READER POLL
Should companies be allowed to ban a rival's AI tools from the workplace over security concerns?
If yesterday proved anything, it's that trust is the real currency in business right now β who you'll let near your code, your capital, your candidacy. The AI giants are drawing battle lines, a central banker is keeping her options open, and a founder wants his company back in his own hands. None of it is chaos, exactly. It's recalibration β everyone quietly deciding who they actually believe. Keep an eye on who blinks first.
Right, that's your lot for today β go top up the coffee, embrace the weekend, and we'll see you back here tomorrow.
You're Missing Half The Story
Enjoying For The Record? Community members unlock two exclusive sections in every edition β The Deeper Dive and The Contrarian Take. $3 a month. Cancel anytime.
Upgrade For $3/month

